JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 8, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Agencia Nacional De Tierras·Respondent Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De San Miguel

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se AMPLÍA en treinta días el término para la recolección de las firmas de la Sentencia SU.288/22.

Lo anterior, por la necesidad de realizar ajustes sustanciales al proyecto original, con el fin de atender las observaciones y comentarios de varios despachos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (22 points)
  1. AMPLIAR en treinta (30) días el término para la recolección de las firmas de la Sentencia SU-288 de 2022 (Expediente T-6.087.412 AC).
  2. Cúmplase,
  3. CRISTINA PARDO SCHLESINGER
  4. Presidenta
  5. NATALIA ÁNGEL CABO
  6. Magistrada
  7. DIANA FAJARDO RIVERA
  8. Magistrada
  9. JORGE ENRIQUE IBÁÑEZ NAJAR
  10. Magistrado
  11. Ausente con excusa
  12. ALEJANDRO LINARES CANTILLO
  13. Magistrado
  14. ANTONIO JOSÉ LIZARAZO OCAMPO
  15. Magistrado
  16. PAOLA ANDREA MENESES MOSQUERA
  17. Magistrada
  18. HERNÁN CORREA CARDOZO
  19. Magistrado (E)
  20. JOSE FERNANDO REYES CUARTAS
  21. Magistrado
  22. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

This decision has no citations or indexed topics in the Court's graph yet.